Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Chronic Illness
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beilby, J.
Right arrow Articles by Holton, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beilby, J.
Right arrow Articles by Holton, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Chronic disease management in Australia: evidence and policy mismatch, with asthma as an example

Justin Beilby

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia, justin.beilby{at}adelaide.edu.au

Christine Holton

Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia

All Western countries are developing and implementing new models for managing asthma. In Australia, the Asthma 3+ Visit Plan was implemented in 2001—2002, with the aim of establishing a structured approach in general practice for people with moderate and severe asthma, within a fee-for-service system. Evidence is emerging that the uptake across general practice has been poor, with approximately 5% of eligible people being enrolled. The reasons for the poor uptake include such factors as an inability to identify people with asthma, general practitioners being too busy with other clinical priorities, and the lack of interest and understanding of the need for a structured approach for this disease. This mismatch between evidence and policy development needs to be rectified, if sustainable models of chronic disease care are to be firmly established in general practice.

Key Words: Asthma • General practice • Chronic disease

Chronic Illness, Vol. 1, No. 1, 73-80 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/17423953050010010501


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
C. Dowrick
In this issue
Chronic Illness, March 1, 2006; 2(1): 1 - 2.
[PDF]