Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Chronic Illness
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gask, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gask, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Mental Health
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Identifying the patient perspective of the quality of mental healthcare for common chronic problems: a qualitative study

Stephen M. Campbell

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK, stephen.campbell{at}manchester.ac.uk

Claire Gately

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

Linda Gask

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

Objectives: To identify which aspects of quality are important to individual patients with common chronic mild-to-moderate mental health problems presenting to general practice and the best method of involving patients with chronic mental health problems in the research process, and to contrast the relevance of a generic questionnaire developed previously with these individual patient narratives.

Methods: Qualitative interviews with 16 patients in Chester and Manchester were subjected to thematic analysis.

Results: Six key themes were identified in relation to the individual patient experience set against a generic patient experience: (1) the healthcare system provides a generic `one size fits all' service, which is incompatible with an individual patient's experience and sense of being as an individual and that privileges medical over social care; (2) patients with mild-to-moderate mental health problems often have feelings of powerlessness and of being `lost' in a system that is more responsive to severe and acute episodes of illness than to chronic morbidity; (3) patients often have unmet needs in relation to the distress of living with mild-to-moderate mental health problems; (4) there are substantial quality deficits in primary care for people with mild-to-moderate chronic mental health problems; (5) general practitioners are rated highly, and the attributes of a good general practitioner can be identified; patients also value continuity of care; (6) engaging people with common chronic mental health problems in the research/policy process requires generic assessment of quality using questionnaires supplemented with more in-depth methods, such as interviews and focus groups. Interviewees highlighted substantial quality deficits in service provision for people with chronic mental health problems. Involving patients with chronic mild-to-moderate mental health problems in the research/policy process requires multiple user involvement strategies, including questionnaires but supplemented with interviews and discussion groups.

Conclusion: Patients with common chronic mental health problems have a clear view about what constitutes quality general practice/practitioner care but highlighted quality deficits for people with chronic mental health conditions.

Key Words: Chronic mental health • General practice • User involvement

Chronic Illness, Vol. 3, No. 1, 46-65 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1742395307079193


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E. Cronin, S. Campbell, M. Ashworth, M. Hann, G. Blashki, J. Murray, and A. Tylee
A tale of two systems: perceptions of primary care for depression in London and Melbourne
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2009; 26(3): 210 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
H Lester and A Howe
Depression in primary care: three key challenges
Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2008; 84(996): 545 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]