This Article Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by El Ansari, W. Articles by El-Silimy, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by El Ansari, W. Articles by El-Silimy, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Are fuel poverty reduction schemes associated with decreased excess winter mortality in elders? A case study from London, UK

Faculty of Sport, Health & Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Oxstalls Campus Oxstalls Lane, Gloucester GL2 9HW, United Kingdom, walidansari{at}glos.ac.uk

Sally El-Silimy

Department of Public Health, Newham Primary Care Trust, Newham, Warehouse K, 2 Western Gateway, London, E16 1DR, United Kingdom

The London Borough of Newham, London piloted the Warm Zone, a government-led fuel poverty reduction scheme. Fuel poverty is often cited as a factor in excess winter mortality (EWM) in the UK. This study reported in this paper assessed whether EWM decreased for people aged 65 years in Newham as compared to all London, employing data from before and throughout the duration of the Warm Zone project. The paper also discusses the difficulties surrounding the measurement and interpretation of health impact relating to fuel poverty. We calculated and compared the yearly EWM indices for people aged 65 years for all of London, and for Newham over 12 years (1993—2005). The yearly EWM ratio for Newham in relation to all London was then calculated and compared. No definitive evidence to support the effect of the War Zone on EMW were noted. Relationships between EWM and fewer poverty reduction schemes are difficult to interpret, as many factors are entangled. These include cold strain and biological, genetic, gender, physiological, thermoregulation, environmental, meteorological, socio-economic, healthcare provision/expenditure, lifestyle and co-morbidity aspects, besides the challenges of sample sizes and whether other fuel poverty reduction schemes were simultaneously in operation. Those in privately owned housing might be `masked' (underestimated) in their vulnerability to fuel poverty. Redefining the specific criteria for eligibility for fuel poverty grants and tackling heat inefficiency in privately owned homes not eligible for home heating improvement despite fulfilling other criteria for vulnerability requires attention. The implications are discussed.

Key Words: Excess winter mortality • Fuel poverty • Housing • Warm zone

Chronic Illness, Vol. 4, No. 4, 289-294 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1742395308090620


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?